We collaborated with multiple cloud vendors to mitigate these risks and keep cloud users safe. Over the past year, Unit 42 discovered multiple vulnerabilities in public cloud infrastructure, caught previously unknown threat actors, and identified unsecure misconfigurations. Vendors look stupid making this argument.As part of our continued commitment to improving public cloud security for everyone, Unit 42 Cloud Researchers study cloud technology in aim of identifying new risks and threats in the cloud. “Stop with the dumb arguments when it comes to the right to repair. “My view is to protect the data on the device with robust security controls, a minimal attack surface, and best practices,” Thornton-Trump concluded. The right-to-repair movement is a natural outgrowth of decades of designed-for-failure products. From a consumer perspective, buying new products every time a new device is released is unsustainable. They build and sell products that are expensive and require users to be as tech savvy as any computer scientist. In the end, the ICT suppliers created this situation themselves. These products are massively deployed and undersecured,” he said. “The devices should be designed to be secure. Nathan Proctor, senior right-to-repair campaign director for the California Public Interest Research Group (CALPIRG) admitted that the right to repair before the right to security may be putting the cart before the horse. AI, deep learning, autonomous anomalistic detection, and response with human verifiable resources to validate are our best forms of defense.” Amazingly enough, all of those defenses are the primary products of the cybersecurity industry. ICT introduces a new set of challenges for us. “Complete visibility is an absolute must in today’s environment. Flory III, CISO for Harbor Security, agreed. “From the security discussion, it seems a diversion and begs the question are really wasting our time about what kind of proprietary screwdriver you need to open the damn thing? “The modern threat is the data on the device and not the device function itself,” Thornton-Trump explained. That model is very good for the cybersecurity industry. Apple has made a great deal of money keeping customers within their “walled garden.” On the other hand, Microsoft created a profitable entire supply chain of vendors dedicated to setting up, updating, and repairing poorly designed products. Related: Safer Internet Day 2023: It's a dangerous business, going online It’s more environmentally friendly than replacement, allows for a supply chain of repair shops, and can build a community of mod’ers.” “This security hot take is an industry straw man designed to protect the value of the customer revenue,” said Ian Thornton-Trump, CISO for Cyjax. In the cybersecurity industry, however, there is strong support for the right to repair. Most of them are inherently vulnerable to exploitation and disruption from both near and far.” The problem is that if a human can find a defense, a human can find a way around that defense, intentionally or by accident.Ī 2019 report from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace explained, “The technologies are mostly dual use, in that they can be used as much to serve malicious or lethal purposes as they can be harnessed to enhance social and economic development. ICT Security is a design afterthought dealt with by software patches. There is evidence that the contents were manipulated with the help of Chinese nationals to embarrass the Bidens.īut from a cybersecurity aspect, that isn’t the point. An authorized repairman downloaded the data from the device and sold it to the Trump campaign. One of the big stories before in 2020 was Hunter Biden’s laptop. The FTC pointed out that authorized repair shops were just as likely to do the same but there had been no evidence of that actually happening. The argument was that independent repair shops could plant malware and steal personal information from devices. The advocates for the bill claimed the committee members caved to pressure from the tech industry and pointed to an FTC 2021 report from the FTC discounting the industries’ argument. The bill, however, died in committee in May with a rare unanimous bi-partisan vote. Senate Bill 393 represented the most comprehensive attempt to allow people to get devices repaired rather than replaced. It is still an uphill fight in California. Industry lobbyists lost the argument in New York State, which passed a right-to-repair law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |